Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Vaclav Safranek vs Camilo Ugo Carabelli Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Safranek vs Carabelli analysis and find out who is favored!
Vaclav Safranek vs Camilo Ugo Carabelli Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Safranek 1 - 1 Carabelli
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Safranek has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Carabelli has won 48.68%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Safranek, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Carabelli has won 55.65%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 34.93% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Safranek has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Carabelli has saved 60.96% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Safranek has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Carabelli winning 67.12% (W/L 49/ 24) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Safranek has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 62% (W/L 90/ 56), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 2). Carabelli has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 64% (W/L 287/ 159), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Safranek winning 1 times. They have played 5 sets in total, with Safranek winning 3 and Carabelli winning 2. The last match between Safranek and Carabelli was at the M25 Poznan, 24-08-2019, Semifinals, Clay with Vaclav Safranek getting the victory 6-4 6-2.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:24:30.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Safranek and Carabelli have played a deciding set 1 times, with Safranek winning 0 times and Carabelli 1 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Safranek winning 0, and Carabelli 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Safranek has played against opponents with an average rank of while Carabelli has played against players with an average rank of 280.96.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Safranek has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Carabelli has won 68% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Safranek has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Carabelli has converted 46.73% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
882
Rank
191
High
30
Age
R
Plays
1
Total1
0
Hard0
1
Clay1
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
110
Rank
96
High
24
Age
R
Plays
L
W
W
W
L
W
L
L
L
L
Form
W
L
L
W
L
W
L
L
L
L
56% (318-248)
Career Total W/L
63% (316-184)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
66% (27-14)
$112,135
Career Prize Money
$130,440
0
YTD Titles
2
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Vaclav Safranek | Camilo Ugo Carabelli |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 3 | 2 |
| Games Won | 23 | 20 |
| Aces (Total) | 6 | 2 |
| DFs (Total) | 3 | 3 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:24:30 | 1:24:30 |
| 1st Serve % | 61% (74/121) | 53% (71/134) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 74% (55/74) | 68% (48/71) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 47% (22/47) | 49% (31/63) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 58% (7/12) | 50% (5/10) |
| Return Points W% | 41% (55/134) | 36% (44/121) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 50% (1/2) | 50% (1/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 50% (2/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 50% (2/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 50% (2/1) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 6-2 |
Stats 
Vaclav Safranek
Player
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
53%
(
31 of
58)
1st Serve %
69%
(
41 of
59)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
0
81%
(
25 of
31)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
24 of
41)
44%
(
12 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
36%
(
21 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
27 of
59)
64
Total Points Won
53
|
||||
| 2-6 6-1 6-4 |
Stats
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
Player
Vaclav Safranek
40%
(
30 of
75)
1st Serve %
68%
(
43 of
63)
1
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
1
80%
(
24 of
30)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
30 of
43)
51%
(
23 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
37%
(
28 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
23 of
63)
70
Total Points Won
68
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Vaclav Safranek | Camilo Ugo Carabelli |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 66% (27/14) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 60% (56/37) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 54% (493/425) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 67% (2/1) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 66% (25/13) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0.21 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 95 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0.19 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 85 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 237.41 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 63% (1864/2965) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 67% (1257/1864) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 49% (536/1101) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 47% (150/321) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 42% (1264/2994) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (2/2) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 33% (1/2) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 43% (3/4) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 78% (21/6) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 64% (25/39) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 50% (10/20) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 73% (8/11) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 100% (23/23) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (23/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 22% (18/4) |
Vaclav Safranek Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Matthias Bachinger
Player
Vaclav Safranek
52%
(
25 of
48)
1st Serve %
66%
(
44 of
67)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
68%
(
17 of
25)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
25 of
44)
43%
(
10 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
44%
(
21 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
33 of
67)
60
Total Points Won
55
|
7-6(6) 1-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Aldin Setkic
Player
Vaclav Safranek
54%
(
41 of
76)
1st Serve %
66%
(
47 of
71)
7
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
1
78%
(
32 of
41)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
30 of
47)
51%
(
18 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
34%
(
26 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
31 of
71)
81
Total Points Won
66
|
7-6(2) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Rudolf Molleker
Player
Vaclav Safranek
52%
(
22 of
42)
1st Serve %
60%
(
25 of
42)
5
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
73%
(
16 of
22)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
75%
(
15 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
26%
(
11 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
25 of
42)
56
Total Points Won
28
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Oscar Jose Gutierrez
Player
Vaclav Safranek
66%
(
49 of
74)
1st Serve %
72%
(
51 of
71)
1
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
0
65%
(
32 of
49)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
30 of
51)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
39%
(
29 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
33 of
71)
78
Total Points Won
67
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Vaclav Safranek
Player
Otto Virtanen
70%
(
50 of
71)
1st Serve %
57%
(
36 of
63)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
66%
(
33 of
50)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
22 of
36)
43%
(
9 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
41%
(
29 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
30 of
63)
72
Total Points Won
62
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Petr Nouza
Player
Vaclav Safranek
69%
(
59 of
85)
1st Serve %
78%
(
70 of
90)
2
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
2
64%
(
38 of
59)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
43 of
70)
46%
(
12 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
41%
(
35 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
37 of
90)
87
Total Points Won
88
|
6-4 1-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Vaclav Safranek
Player
Leo Borg
73%
(
32 of
44)
1st Serve %
54%
(
22 of
41)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
69%
(
22 of
32)
1st Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
58%
(
7 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
100%
(
6 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
34%
(
15 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
66%
(
27 of
41)
56
Total Points Won
29
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Vaclav Safranek
Player
Gian Marco Ortenzi
73%
(
56 of
77)
1st Serve %
69%
(
51 of
74)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
66%
(
37 of
56)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
30 of
51)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
14 of
23)
22%
(
2 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
35%
(
27 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
30 of
74)
80
Total Points Won
71
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Vaclav Safranek
Player
Sebastian Gima
80%
(
70 of
88)
1st Serve %
48%
(
48 of
99)
0
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
5
74%
(
52 of
70)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
30 of
48)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
29 of
51)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
31%
(
27 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
40 of
99)
101
Total Points Won
86
|
6-3 5-7 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Riccardo Balzerani
Player
Vaclav Safranek
49%
(
35 of
72)
1st Serve %
73%
(
46 of
63)
1
Aces
0
7
Double Faults
1
63%
(
22 of
35)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
24 of
46)
49%
(
18 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
8 of
17)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
44%
(
32 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
31 of
63)
71
Total Points Won
64
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Camilo Ugo Carabelli Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Bernabe Zapata Miralles
Player
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
59%
(
41 of
70)
1st Serve %
57%
(
38 of
67)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
68%
(
28 of
41)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
24 of
38)
66%
(
19 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
33%
(
23 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
27 of
67)
74
Total Points Won
63
|
7-6(1) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Luciano Darderi
Player
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
65%
(
40 of
62)
1st Serve %
55%
(
33 of
60)
1
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
1
70%
(
28 of
40)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
20 of
33)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
39%
(
24 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
30 of
60)
68
Total Points Won
54
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Hamad Medjedovic
Player
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
62%
(
41 of
66)
1st Serve %
57%
(
39 of
68)
12
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
3
76%
(
31 of
41)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
25 of
39)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
10 of
29)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
35%
(
23 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
33 of
68)
76
Total Points Won
58
|
7-6(1) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Luciano Darderi
Player
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
39%
(
14 of
36)
1st Serve %
46%
(
25 of
54)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
86%
(
12 of
14)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
15 of
25)
73%
(
16 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
9 of
29)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
8 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
30 of
54)
58
Total Points Won
32
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
Player
Taro Daniel
52%
(
29 of
56)
1st Serve %
57%
(
45 of
79)
4
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
2
55%
(
16 of
29)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
23 of
45)
37%
(
10 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
11 of
34)
41%
(
7 of
17)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
54%
(
30 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
45 of
79)
71
Total Points Won
64
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
74%
(
57 of
77)
1st Serve %
65%
(
59 of
91)
7
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
0
86%
(
49 of
57)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
45 of
59)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
69%
(
22 of
32)
0%
(
0 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
19%
(
15 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
26%
(
24 of
91)
86
Total Points Won
82
|
7-6(4) 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
Player
Bernabe Zapata Miralles
57%
(
43 of
75)
1st Serve %
68%
(
60 of
88)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
72%
(
31 of
43)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
38 of
60)
63%
(
20 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
15%
(
2 of
13)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
32%
(
24 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
38 of
88)
89
Total Points Won
74
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Elahi Galan
Player
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
64%
(
45 of
70)
1st Serve %
54%
(
56 of
103)
5
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
4
78%
(
35 of
45)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
37 of
56)
60%
(
15 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
21 of
47)
12%
(
2 of
17)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
29%
(
20 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
45 of
103)
95
Total Points Won
78
|
7-6(2) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Joao Lucas Reis Da Silva
Player
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
73%
(
37 of
51)
1st Serve %
59%
(
50 of
85)
1
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
3
68%
(
25 of
37)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
31 of
50)
71%
(
10 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
13 of
35)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
31%
(
16 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
41 of
85)
76
Total Points Won
60
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
Player
Orlando Luz
60%
(
50 of
83)
1st Serve %
60%
(
53 of
89)
5
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
2
58%
(
29 of
50)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
39 of
53)
70%
(
23 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
17 of
36)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
37%
(
31 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
33 of
89)
85
Total Points Won
87
|
1-6 7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Safranek Vs Carabelli Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
